This website uses cookies

We use cookies and similar technologies on this website to analyze visits and to show you relevant messages on social media. By clicking 'Accept all' you give permission for their placement and for the processing of personal data obtained in this way, as stated in our privacy & cookie statement.

Our privacy & cookie statement:

'Possessing our work against our will'
28 February 2018

'Possessing our work against our will'

This is not the regular story about Escher. This time I'd like to react on a recent article from the Volkskrant, published on Friday 23 February 2018. 'Stedelijk Museum 's Hertogenbosch believes it is time for a Nazi design exhibition' was the headline. In this article, the author situates the artist Maurits Cornelis Escher in the context of Nazi texts and comments on Nazi design. This gives rise to the impression of Escher having been a collaborationist, and that is unwarranted. Escher was not a Nazi sympathizer.

Escher family, Baarn 1942

Escher family, Baarn 1942

Following an introduction on the urgent need for an exhibition on Nazi art in the Netherlands, the article describes the status quo. 'In recent years there has been a cautious breakthrough in terms of Nazi art and Nazi communication.' The author sums this up by citing the reissue of Mein Kampf, The Evidence Room (installation involving reconstructions and casts of a fragment of a crematorium and of the door of a gas chamber), 'and in 2015 Museum Arnhem exhibited for the first time a collection of "collaborationist art" purchased by the Netherlands during the Second World War, including paintings by such artists as Karel Appel, Maurits Escher and Pyke Koch.' The article goes on to quote Director of the Stedelijk Museum 's Hertogenbosch, Timo de Rijk: 'The topic of Nazi design is charged and potentially explosive, and that's exactly why this exhibition is imperative.' And so on.

Here we see some particularly unfortunate framing and formulation. The exhibition in Arnhem pertained to art purchased by the State during the war. This does not mean that the artists concerned were all collaborationists. A great many artists had no influence whatsoever over who purchased their work, as sales were often made by dealers.

In Escher's case, he was no Nazi sympathizer. Indeed, he showed a considerable degree of contempt towards the occupier during the Second World War. He felt deeply uncomfortable at the fact that he was permitted to exhibit his work during the war whilst his Jewish artist friends were not. He repeatedly refused to participate in public events organized by the occupier and did not register with the Kultuurkamer ('Chamber of Culture') on principle. That took courage, and it also entailed consequences. Artists not affiliated with the Kultuurkamer were not allowed to practise their profession or exhibit or sell their work. When one of his prints was nevertheless exhibited without his permission, Escher wrote (20 December 1942):

'Isn’t it preposterous? On the one hand we’re not allowed to exhibit personally, and on the other we're forced to participate, which is tantamount to possessing our work against our will.'

He was particularly aggrieved when it emerged that his teacher and dear friend Jessurun de Mesquita had been deported, and so Escher did his utmost to salvage his work. And after the war, when the Rijksmuseum staged the exhibition Kunst in Vrijheid ('Art in Freedom') displaying the work of artists that had refused to comply with the Nazis' requirements, Escher took part as well, with four lithographs and a drawing. So no, the 'collaborationist art' label does not apply to Escher’s work.

As De Rijk said: 'The topic of Nazi design is charged and potentially explosive'. Which is why caution is warranted when writing on such topics. An incorrect association is easily generated.

I'm afraid the article in the Volkskrant was published in Dutch, nevertheless you can find it here.

Dunja Nadjézjda Hak

Dunja Nadjézjda Hak

Former curator at Escher in Het Paleis

Share:

More stories about Escher

Escher tiles make their debut in the palace

Escher tiles make their debut in the palace

Escher was first and foremost a printmaker. That said, he also produced a variety of designs for art in public spaces. For example, he designed some magnificent tiled pillars with regular tessellations for two schools. The pillars were recently restored and relocated, and now for the first time the original tiles can be seen in Escher in The Palace!
The extraordinary in the ordinary

The extraordinary in the ordinary

The Escher, close up exhibition is closed. The past few months 50,500 visitors have enjoyed this new perspective on Eschers life and work. Over the past few days we have been working into the night to dismantle the exhibition and restore normal order. Back to the permanent set-up, back to everyday business as usual. Luckily the everyday can also be possessed of extraordinary beauty.
From frame to cutout

From frame to cutout

Escher’s work is known for such things as his optical illusions and his playing with perspective. He had an aptitude for rendering day-to-day subjects unfamiliar by means of the viewpoint he took or the cutout he made. The ideal nourishment for this was photography, which Escher took up when he was 15 years old.