This website uses cookies

We use cookies and similar technologies on this website to analyze visits and to show you relevant messages on social media. By clicking 'Accept all' you give permission for their placement and for the processing of personal data obtained in this way, as stated in our privacy & cookie statement.

Our privacy & cookie statement:

Escher versus art criticism
27 October 2018

Escher versus art criticism

Nowadays M.C. Escher may well be very popular with both the general public and art critics, but this was certainly not always the case. He was ignored by many art lovers and critics for a long time. His work was dismissed as decorative and was at best technically deft. Content-wise he had nothing to offer. This opinion is found as far back as the earliest reviews in the twenties and kept resurfacing in the decades that followed. Escher had been exhibiting on a regular basis throughout his life, but these exhibitions failed to draw many visitors. This lasted until the large retrospective exhibition in the Gemeentemuseum in The Hague in 1968, which was the first occasion on which he attracted a large crowd. Ironically, Escher’s popularity with the general public (which kept on growing after his death in 1972) was a reason for critics to consider his work as ‘non-art’. As if to suggest that an artist’s popularity with the common man precluded him from holding the status of real artist. This article from the Nieuwsblad van het Noorden, published on 28 January 1972, is a good example of how art critics often responded to him.

Nieuwsblad van het Noorden, 28 January 1972

Nieuwsblad van het Noorden, 28 January 1972

Initially it seems to be laudatory enough. The headlines are very positive and the author starts with the observation that the artist is becoming increasingly popular with the public. The article was published in response to an Escher exhibition in Pictura in Groningen, but at the same time there is also an exhibition in Museum Boijmans van Beuningen in Rotterdam. ‘At the request of many visitors to the Museum.’ The author suspects that Boijmans would never have held it otherwise. He then begins to systematically tear down the artist, using words such as ‘of little interest’, ‘traditional’, ‘old-fashioned’, ‘forced’, ‘juggling’, ‘game’ and ‘the result of a game of tic-tac-toe’

M.C. Escher, Tetrahedral Planetoid (Tetrahedral Planet), woodcut in green and black, printed from two blocks, April 1954

M.C. Escher, Tetrahedral Planetoid (Tetrahedral Planet), woodcut in green and black, printed from two blocks, April 1954

Article from 'De Tijd' from 1 April 1955 in which Eschers work is called 'too well thought out, too rigid, too mathematical to have any artistical merit.'

Article from 'De Tijd' from 1 April 1955 in which Eschers work is called 'too well thought out, too rigid, too mathematical to have any artistical merit.'

This view of Escher continued to recur regularly in the decades that followed, although positive pieces also appeared. It took until well into the 1990s before there was a consensus on the quality of Escher’s oeuvre and his unique place in art history. Nowadays, the artist is praised universally. He really is everywhere. To begin with, of course, at Escher in The Palace. But consider too the huge crowds drawn by the exhibition in the Fries Museum (which ends this weekend), the exhibition in New York that is currently running and the upcoming first major Escher exhibition in Australia, in The National Gallery of Victoria in Melbourne. The exhibition held in the Centro Cultural Banco do Brasil in Rio de Janeiro is the most obvious proof of Escher’s popularity. Between 18 January and 27 March 2011 it drew 573,691 visitors. Nearly 10,000 a day.

Map is loading...

Erik Kersten

Erik Kersten

Editor

Share:

More Escher today

Wall mosaic in the Alhambra

Wall mosaic in the Alhambra

On 20 October 1922, Escher creates a drawing that—in retrospect—would have a major impact on his life. He made his first voyage by freighter that autumn, from Amsterdam to the Spanish port city of Málaga. The ship also moored in Alicante and Taragona, after which Escher traveled by train to Barcelona, Madrid, Avila and Toledo. In each city he stayed for a few days to take in the setting properly. On 17 October, after a long and very slow train journey from Toledo, he arrived in Granada. There he visited the beautiful Alhambra. This 14th-century castle was once built as an aristocratic and administrative centre for the last Moorish regime in Spain.
Woodblocks and The Regular Division of The Plane

Woodblocks and The Regular Division of The Plane

From 2 October 2018 to 13 January 2019, Escher in The Palace will be exhibiting two special woodblocks that Escher cut in May 1957 and the book in which the accompanying prints were published. The blocks and the book stem from the collection of Museum Meermanno in The Hague. Escher in The Palace is proud to be able to exhibit them and we are therefore very grateful to Museum Meermanno for this loan.
Da Vinci and Escher

Da Vinci and Escher

As of today Leonardo da Vinci can be seen in the Teylers museum in Haarlem. It is the first major overview ever of original artworks by Renaissance artist Leonardo da Vinci (1452-1519) in the Netherlands. Teylers shows 33 drawings of the master and as many works of contemporaries. Da Vinci was not only able to draw and paint beautifully, he is also world famous for his inventions of flying machines and military artillery. He did not see art and science as separate ‘worlds’. For him they had everything to do with each other. This is where Da Vinci and Escher find each other. Both are first and foremost excellent observers. They look at the world with a logical, orderly view and know how to get those observations and the thoughts they derive from them on paper. They both did this with their left hand. Both are also part of popular culture through one or a few works (think of the Mona Lisa and the Vitruvian man and Relativity and Day and Night), but it is questionable if people know who the makers are.