This website uses cookies

We use cookies and similar technologies on this website to analyze visits and to show you relevant messages on social media. By clicking 'Accept all' you give permission for their placement and for the processing of personal data obtained in this way, as stated in our privacy & cookie statement.

Our privacy & cookie statement:

Dreaming of Belvedere
4 April 2015

Dreaming of Belvedere

To many, Escher’s impossible buildings are the highlights of his oeuvre. These are the prints that visitors look for when they come to our museum. They stand in front of them and discuss with their family and friends what they see happening before their eyes. In that respect they really are conversation pieces. If you take ‘impossible’ in a broad sense, Up and Down, House of Stairs, Relativity, Convex and Concave, Print Gallery, Belvedere, Ascending and Descending and Waterfall can be defined as impossible buildings. But it is the last three of these that Escher himself referred to as such and which are also the ones most open to interpretation. ‘Look, see that? That’s impossible, right?’

M.C. Escher, Belvédère, litho, mei 1958

M.C. Escher, Belvédère, litho, mei 1958

During a lecture in 1963, Escher once said*:

‘If you want to draw attention to something impossible, you must try to deceive first yourself and then your audience, by presenting your work in such a way that the impossible element is veiled and a superficial observer would not even notice. There should be a certain mysteriousness that does not immediately hit the eye’.

Escher was therefore very purposeful in deceiving his audience, disguising his impossibilities in such a way that at first sight it appeared possible for them to actually exist. The lithograph Belvedere is a perfect example of this. A three-dimensional building that can be neatly depicted on a flat surface, but is impossible as a spatial figure. Escher beautifully illustrates this contrast with the man on the bench. On the floor is a drawing of a so-called Necker cube. This is a perspective drawing of a cube whose lines intersect. This makes it impossible to tell which side is on the front. Hence this cube can exist on paper, but what he is holding in his hands does not. It is an object that is impossible. He looks at it in amazement, barely realising that there is an equally impossible building behind him. In 1958 Escher also made a wood engraving prominently featuring this man with his impossible cube.

M.C. Escher, Man with cuboid, wood engraving, 1958

M.C. Escher, Man with cuboid, wood engraving, 1958

M.C. Escher, Belvedere, lithograph, May 1958, detail, mirrored

M.C. Escher, Belvedere, lithograph, May 1958, detail, mirrored

A Necker-cube (left) with its two possible interpretations

A Necker-cube (left) with its two possible interpretations

The name of the building he is sitting in front of is a reference to the architectural term of the same name. Etymologically, 'belvedere' stems from the Latin for ‘beautiful view’. It is an addition to a building affording a better view, in the form of a gallery (also called an upper gallery) or a tower. Towers also had a strategic role, because they were used in defence. It can also be a complete building, often a palace or a castle, built on a hill or mountain in order to achieve the aforementioned beautiful view. In the Netherlands, the tower shape is common, whereas in the rest of Europe several examples of palaces are extant.

Escher’s print conflates tower and gallery. The walls that are spill over the sides of the frame on the left and right also seem to suggest that this beautiful view is an addition to an existing building. The characters’ clothing is a clear allusion to the late Middle Ages. The woman at the bottom right even has a direct link with Hell, the copy he made of the Garden of Earthly Delights by Hieronymus Bosch. The landscape at which the people are looking cannot be defined geographically. But given Escher’s love for the Italian landscape, which he immortalised countless times in the prints he produced over the 1928-1935 period, we can say with near certainty that this is an Italian palazzo. Somewhere in the Abruzzo, for example, though Sicily is another candidate.

 

Source

[*] Lecture for the Mathematical Centre Amsterdam, 5 November 1963.

Erik Kersten

Erik Kersten

Editor

Micky Piller

Micky Piller

Former curator at Escher in The Palace

Share:

More Escher today

Playing with puzzles

Playing with puzzles

‘I used to love Grimms’ fairy tales a lot. As a child, even as a boy, I was very moved by them. Now I’m rereading The Hobbit, by Tolkien, the journey of those dwarfs. It’s so far removed from reality. Why (gaze stripped of all playfulness) do we have to endure this miserable reality all the time? Why can’t we just play?’ Escher said this in the long interview with journalist Bibeb, printed in weekly magazine Vrij Nederland on 20 April 1968. He was known to many as a serious and straightforward artist, but this quote once again makes things less clear-cut.
The Plague by Albert Camus

The Plague by Albert Camus

French philosopher, journalist, writer and Nobel laureate Albert Camus wrote his novel The Plague in 1947. The book was a direct response to the horrors of World War II. The disease itself and its defeat are a metaphor for the fight against the Nazis, the brown plague. In the current corona crisis, war is a distant concept for most of the affected countries, but other than that the parallels between the book and the bizarre reality of 2020 are striking. Escher attentively read The Plague and other works by Camus. And it is back in the spotlight now.
Balcony

Balcony

During the war, Escher had other things to worry about but, after the liberation in May 1945, he released the brakes on his productivity and creativity. But the start was a difficult one. He had to get used to freedom and initially limited himself to reprinting old prints and selling them. The first creative result was the lithograph Balcony, created in July 1945.